Louie2U- Posted on Saturday, November 12, 2016
Bankwest when under Royal Bank of Scotland ownership was allowed & protected to continue trading as normal for a long period of time whilst insolvent. They continued to issue loans of all descriptions together with other financial products & have never, not once, been held to account in an Australian court of law. Why? Who protected them?
Wankbest were bought by CBA as a much heralded, "bargain buy", then CBA began using their insured clawback provisions to ensure that they did not fully pay the bargain price in total. Many innocent Australians, myself included, were caught up in the mess. We had our livelihoods completely destroyed, our life's work taken, stripped of dignity to the point some have suicided as a way out, been belittled, trampled over by lawyers, insolvency businesses, business brokers, realtors & all the rest of the bankster hangers on as part of their white collar criminal cartel.
Yet, there has never been a case brought to an Australian court of law about why Wankbest was allowed, permitted & protected to trade while obviously insolvent.
If ever an everyday Australian did that, the judicial system would throw a book of charges at you. But not this bank. Why? There has been no prostician brave enough to even consider this question let alone, ask it.
Trust a banker? Never! Trust any of those in their white collar criminal brigade? As if! They need to be slaughtered, salted, hung, quartered & put out in the middle of the desert sun to dry. Middle of Australia sounds good - the dead heart in the middle of a dry claypan during the dry season should do it 