Quantcast
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 4106

BFCSA: Victims of TRIO CAPITAL and ASIC's pathetic regulatory inertia Fight Back

Image may be NSFW.
Clik here to view.

PRESS RELEASE

Victims of Financial Fraud (VOFF Inc) Monday 25 March 2019

ORGANISED FINANCIAL THEFT - REGULATORS SHOULD BE IN HANDCUFFS

 

The Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA),

which is meant to redress victims of bank misconduct, is run by the banks and is not accountable to

Parliament. BFCSA conclude that AFCA is designed to continue the protection racket the

government and regulators have been running on behalf of Australian banks.

 

According to Denise Brailey of the Banking and Finance Consumers Support Association (BFCSA),

Treasure Peter Costello attended the 2005 Macquarie Bank seminar that encouraged financial

advisers to target the asset rich income poor (older people who own their home). Does this mean

Treasury knew about the ARIP strategy (asset stripping) and did nothing?

With tens of thousands of banking victims and a $75 million banking royal commission, that only

scratched the surface, VOFF see the Trio Capital fraud in a new perspective.

The Australian Securities Investments Commission (ASIC), the Australian Prudential Regulatory

Authority (APRA) and the Treasury Department controlled the Trio narrative.

 

ASIC deflected attention away from the fact that the Trio perpetrator had lied on his licence application form to get an

Australian Financial Services (AFS) licence. ASIC verified no data for any licencee, leaving people vulnerable to white collar criminals.

Hart deceived ASIC, APRA, Custodians, research houses, a

star rating firm, an auditor, 150 financial planners and 6,092 Trio consumers.

Hart hid behind ASIC and APRA and the regulators legitimised his criminal activities.

Consumers accepted the licence was protection and they accepted the implied regulatory credibility.

But it was a false sense of security.

Consumers would have been BETTER OFF WITH NO REGULATORS

 

 

Consumers were harmed by ASIC’s ineptness that can be traced back to an interaction with the

owners of Trio well before the Trio scheme existed. Around 2002, ASIC was carrying out an

investigation into an alleged tax fraud by the Queensland businessman Steven Hart. Mr Hart’s

business paper trail led to the Hong Kong office of the American lawyer Jack Flader and Scottish

accountant James Sutherland.

 

ASIC travelled to the Hong Kong office, secured 100,000 documents

that would be used as evidence in the case. During this period, Mr Flader and Mr Sutherland’s names

were already on ASIC’s company registration database, they were the owners of a holding company

they had registered with ASIC in 2001.

 

Clearly ASIC failed to recognize that it already had Mr Flader and Mr Sutherland’s names on its

database. It was not until November 2003 that Flader and Sutherland’s holding company purchased a

Trust fund in Australia that eventually became the Trio Capital Limited scheme. By early 2004, Trio

had the necessary licence to operate and handle superannuation savings, opening the way for a

disaster to hit thousands of hard-working honest Australians.

 

Barrister Niall Coburn claims, "You can't have people lying to ASIC because it undermines the whole

system we have to protect the trillions of dollars we have put away in superannuation for our elderly."

ASIC was indeed lied to and the deception caused a systemic failure of the financial system. The Trio

victims deserve redress after the shocking harm they suffered.

 

John Telford

Email: johnt@1earth.net

Phone (02) 4283 5755

R Gallagher Executive Member VOFF Inc

 

Mobile 0417 415 675

 

 

 


Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 4106

Trending Articles