Quantcast
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 4106

BFCSA: Former PM John Howard takes his entitlement - Hey Big Spender!!!

Image may be NSFW.
Clik here to view.

John Howard takes his entitlement

By Unconventional Economist in Australian budget, Australian Politics

at 9:59 am on January 18, 2017 | 0 comments

By Leith van Onselen

http://www.macrobusiness.com.au/2017/01/john-howard-takes-entitlement/

 

John Howard was always the master of ‘middle-class welfare’, as evidenced by the questionable increases in the eligibility for the Aged Pension, baby bonuses, family tax benefits, and superannuation concessions under his watch.

Now it has been revealed by the Huffington Post that John Howard has claimed far more taxpayer expenses than Australia’s other living former Prime Ministers:

Former PMs are given “a number of facilities at the discretion of the prime minister of the day” and currently include car costs, office costs, telecommunications and travel costs…

In the latest disclosure of expenditure on the Department of Finance website (for the period from January to June 2016), it is revealed Howard, the second-longest serving PM, was the biggest spender among former leaders. Howard billed $152,970 in the six-month period, the bulk of which came from $112,434 in office facilities, nearly double that of the next highest amount in the same category (Rudd, on $63,210).

Image may be NSFW.
Clik here to view.
ScreenHunter_16917 Jan. 18 09.46

Howard’s expenses have consistently remained far higher than other former PMs in recent reporting periods…

Howard has claimed the most amount among the ex-PMs in six of the last seven disclosure periods…

Looking back further to expenses from the start of 2013, Howard alone racked up more than one million dollars in claims…

The next highest amount is Julia Gillard, on $807,000, but $408,304 of that came from one single expense, an office fit out in 2014. Next on the list is Hawke with $566,000.

Image may be NSFW.
Clik here to view.
ScreenHunter_16918 Jan. 18 09.49

As a long time MPs and former Prime Ministers, the above retired leaders would already be receiving massive parliamentary pensions. So the obvious question arises: why are they charging taxpayers such outlandish costs? And why should they not also share in the burden of balancing the Budget?

 

 


Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 4106

Trending Articles