Quantcast
Channel: Uncategorized Category
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 4106

BFCSA: NO TRIBUNAL - ONLY A ROYAL COMMISSION into the entire BANKING SYSTEM. 2 million suffering SUB PRIME LENDING

$
0
0
 
BFCSA: NO TRIBUNAL - ONLY A ROYAL COMMISSION into the entire BANKING SYSTEM. 2 million suffering SUB PRIME LENDING
 

BANKERS AT WAR WITH CONSUMERS.  Banks are in fact outnumbered and answer is NO BAIL OUT!!! Entsch and

Whacka have lost the plot. Minister O'Dwyer cowering in a corner, agrees with the PM. Christiansen poncing around

with hollow words and Ramsay trying to make banks happy by keeping the FOS system of complaint handling.

 

LABOR is on the right track with an RC. The rest of the political soup mix are on a mission of political

suicide and death by two million CUTS from aggrieved MORTGAGE VICTIMS.

Yes folks the NEW YEAR of Bank Mayhem 2017 has just got started and the fireworks will be on full explosion until the

next election....BRING IT ON and:

Consumers wish an unhappy year 2017 to all Banker Wankers across the GLOBE!

 

Push for banks to pay higher penalties? Who's dumb idea is that? ONLY A ROYAL COMMISSION into the entire BANKING SYSTEM and financial products and advisers can relieve the suffering of 2 million people by Bank driven SCANDALS in SUB PRIME LENDING.
 
We warned you: the BANKING TRIBUNAL is a DAFT IDEA and a Prime Ministerial Turnbull thought bubble!!!! Banks will own such a scheme and consumers will be screed once more. Enough! Banks will pay for the scheme and Banker Lawyers will have a tight hold on the continued CONTROL FRAUD raging across the entire nation and Banking Sector.
 
Consumers will be up against Bank lawyers and no common sense protection. A pox on idiots that falsely and knowingly suggest otherwise.
 
Liberal MP Warren Entsch will push the government to form a full-blown banking tribunal and make banks pay three times the cost of any damages to fund it.
 
The move comes despite indications from the government it would not go ahead with a banking tribunal and would instead look at changes to financial ombudsmen. Whoops a new FOS???? New FOS would match the OLD FOS and hammer consumers.
 
Read more drivel coming from these two MPs. Either they are stupid or on side with PM Malcolm T and his "protect the banks" policies.
 
Backbenchers such as MP Mr Entsch and Nationals Senator John "Wacka" Williams' concerns over banks had been allayed after Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull said the government was working towards a low-cost tribunal for victims of misbehaviour by the Big Banks as recommended by the government-dominated parliamentary inquiries.
 
Under pressure from popular calls for a royal commission into the banks from Labor, the Coalition-dominated House of Representatives Standing Committee on Economics is in panic mode to protect their bank mates. TOTAL LUNACY from NATS and LIBS
 
But an interim report by University of Melbourne Professor Ian Ramsay recommended against a tribunal and instead said the Financial Ombudsman Service and Credit and Investments Ombudsman should be merged and given greater powers to award compensation. TOTAL LUNACY from RAMSAY!!!!
 
Financial Services Minister Kelly O'Dwyer then said the government meant a "small 't' tribunal" and suggested the government would instead follow those recommendations. "When the Prime Minister was talking about a tribunal he was talking about a small 't' tribunal, which was a catchall for having a one-stop consumer complaints stop," she said. She said a proper tribunal would be too legalistic and less consumer friendly. (Yes indeed Minister - entrenched by Banker loving law firm Gadens unique authorities)
 
So why doesn't KELLY O'DWYER go out on a limb and do the right thing and start shouting ROYAL COMMISSION???
 
The issue is a thorn in the side of the government, every time the banks increase interest rates for mortgage owners or do not pass on the full rate cut.
 
Liberal National MP George Christensen - came out in support of a royal commission into banks after Westpac, National Australia Bank said they would raise fixed and variable home loan rates. "My opinion just changed again. We need a banking royal commission," the Nationals MP posted to his Facebook page.
  
Mr Christensen has threatened to cross the floor over the matter - but has yet to do so despite an opportunity to defy the government over the matter. JUST DO IT GEORGE and stop poncing about with hollow words.
 
Professor Ramsay's final report is due by the end of March 2017.
BFCSA Members who harbour a treasure trove of evidence against the banks, are users of the diabolically corrupt FOS system and voted FOS down as 5% satisfaction rate.
 
The CCLS in bed with ASIC voted FOS in at 95% contrived rating!!! Ughhh, neither are known for TRUTH to Parliament.
 
This time Ramsay will have to step up to the plate and give a TRUE account of why FOS average compo claims awarded are an obligatory (keep bankers happy) $20k - $40k discount on a mortgage after admitting errors in approvals!!! Its FRAUD Ian, and you need to be on top of this. If the REVIEW is another COVER UP, as in previous years, consumers will smell it weeks before delivery and YOU will face the political backlash. The maximum provision of $312k per person compensation limit does into cover the average $500k losses and the piddly $20k hand out in return for CONFIDENTIALITY. Its another secrecy mechanism to ensure cover up for the bankers system.
 
What needs to happen in this RAMSAY REVIEW is this:-
 
  1. COMPO BAR RAISED TO $500k.
  2. no use of "bank specialists briefed by GADENS,"
  3. If loan was unaffordable then full extinguishment of mortgage - as a guide and
  4. All INTEREST ONLY LOANS to be converted to NON RECOURSE AND YES IAN RESTROSPECTIVELY!!!!!
  5. Therefore, all debt to be extinguished.....................
 
Someone needs to man up and tell the truth! You can feel the tension across all states with Liberals and NAT Coalition in complete disarray.
 
At least Prime Minister Turnbull is now realising the AUSTRALIAN BANKING ISSUE IS A WHOPPER CONTROL FRAUD.
 
Denise L Brailey
and here is the article that sparked off the ISSUE and set the pace for 2017
 

Push for banks to pay higher penalties

Australian Financial Review Jan 4 2017

Primrose Riordan

 Liberal MP Warren

Entsch will push the government to form a full-blown banking tribunal and make banks pay three times the cost of any damages to fund it.

The move comes despite indications from the government it would not go ahead with a banking tribunal and would instead look at changes to financial ombudsmen.

Backbenchers such as Mr Entsch and Nationals senator John "Wacka" Williams' concerns over banks had been allayed after Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull said the government was working towards a low-cost tribunal for victims of misbehaviour by the big banks as recommended by the government-dominated parliamentary.

Under pressure from popular calls for a royal commission into the banks from Labor, the Coalition-dominated House of Representatives Standing Committee on Economics last month recommended the establishment of a "banking and financial sector tribunal" by next July.

But an interim report by University of Melbourne professor Ian Ramsay recommended against a tribunal and instead said the Financial Ombudsman Service and Credit and Investments Ombudsman should be merged and given greater powers to award compensation.

Financial Services Minister Kelly O'Dwyer then said the government meant a "small 't' tribunal" and suggested the government would instead follow the recommendations.

"When the Prime Minister was talking about a tribunal he was talking about a small 't' tribunal, which was a catchall for having a one-stop consumer complaints stop," she said.

She said a proper tribunal would be too legalistic and less consumer friendly.

Mr Entsch said he would be pressing the leadership not to pursue this route and instead set up a tribunal.

"If they are ineffective let’s make the bloody thing effective. The banks have dragged things on for years and time has been on their side," he said..

"To make an effective tribunal we need to look at something different that has teeth that I can make enforceable outcome determinations, that can also have penalties."

He also said as a way to fund the tribunal, banks could pay out three times the cost of their violations.

"I'm a fan of what they do in the United States; three times the value of the damages. Some of that can go as compensation for the victims the bulk I suspect can go to fund the tribunal," he said.

The issue in a thorn in the side of the government every time the banks increase interest rates for mortgage owners or do not pass on the full rate cut.

In late November, Liberal National MP George Christensen - who holds a crucial vote for the government in the House of Representatives - came out in support of a royal commission into banks after Westpac, National Australia Bank said they would raise fixed and variable home loan rates.

"My opinion just changed again. We need a banking royal commission," the Nationals MP posted to his Facebook page.

Mr Christensen has threatened to cross the floor over the matter - but has yet to do so despite an opportunity to defy the government over the matter.

Professor Ramsay's final report is due by the end of March 2017.

 

 


Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 4106

Trending Articles