Clik here to view.
This is just a sample:
" I wrote to ASIC in early 2013 attaching evidence of my case and the highlighted constructive defaults of my companies and self instigated by the Commonwealth Bank/Bankwest. ASIC made contact with me by phone stating that they believed that the Bank may have acted in a misleading and unconscionable manner.; the Bank may have acted in bad faith. On 23 May,2013 I received a reply from the ASIC Commissioner Mr Peter Kell stating that they are looking into the matter. On 9 August,2013 I received a response from ASIC advising that they have decided not to take any further action. Further they went onto say...it is not obliged to take enforcement action in relation to all reports of misconduct."
I hope these brief comments highlights that ASIC were not acting in my best interest and their change of thought on firstly they thought the Commonwealth Bank was guilty then changed their minds saying they have ceased to investigate. The question is WHY?
Terry
Denise: The senior partner of Norton Rose Fulbright ( David Goldman) is the main law firm that represents the Bank, sits on an ASIC insolvency committee. There is a conflict of interest and perhaps he influences decision made against the Bank?
